Question:
autocorrelation? can anyone please define or reffer me something for help thank you?
Blake
2014-05-11 13:07:25 UTC
What is autocorrelation? Which assumption is violated that causes autocorrelation? What are its consequences? How can you detect the problem? Define any two tests which are used to test the autocorrelation?


can anyone please define all these parts
Four answers:
2014-05-11 17:23:31 UTC
Autocorrelation is a correlation between the u terms in that equation. For example, Y=a+bX+u. If U is autocorrelated such as ut=f(ut-1), it will cause a wrong sign, and the variable might not be significant at 5%. D-W will show that it has this problem. To solve it, the question might have to be respecified. It might have to add more or cut some variables, or change the relation from linear to non-linear through transforming data such as the use of ln in the equation. F-test and R*2 will drop only a little if that variable due to wrong specification is dropped from the equation.
2016-10-18 05:20:44 UTC
Define Reffer
OPM
2014-05-11 17:08:00 UTC
Autocorrelation is not a true correlation.It is easiest to understand it by a simple one dimensional example. Imagine you had a coin toss game where the tosses were additive. It if is heads then you add one. If it is tails then you add zero. I recommend doing this on your own in Excel if you know how to generate random numbers.



Each signal is independent and uncorrelated with each other. There is no coin toss correlation, but there will certainly be autocorrelation.



Imagine the sequence of coin tosses as HTHTHTHHTTTH so the time series would look roughly like a highly correlated line as your values would be 112233455556. If you treat those as happening at times 1...12 you will plot them and run a regression on them then you get Y=.4685X+.4545 and your R^2 is over 95%. That is an incredible degree of correlation when in fact every observation was uncorrelated with the prior observation. In fact, no observation could be used to predict any other observation.



The consequences of concern in the textbook is that the standard errors are too small and so tests of significance are distorted so that the t-test will show as significant too often.



Although the events are random, the trend is forced by the additive relationship. So the time trend is predictable, but it is dangerous to attribute too much to the series as it is unlikely you really know what is going on.



The Durbin Watson test or the Breusch–Godfrey test can be used to discover the problem. Common sense warns you that if the present is dependent on the past but consists of independent events, then you will have autocorrelation.
Chad
2014-05-11 13:40:41 UTC
Autocorrelation is usually used with time data. If over time a variable is correlated to itself, then that is Autocorrelation. In other words, if the past value of a variable affects the current value then autocorrelation exists. This means a variable is not truely independant, because it depends on a previouse instance of itself.



There are a bunch of tests to look for autocorrelation, for example the Durbin–Watson autocorrelation statistic. You can run these tests faily easily using STATA or other statistical programs.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...